Showing posts with label Google Flight Search. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google Flight Search. Show all posts

Google Flight Search: Google on its way to Online Travel Dominance

Google has began the first steps towards future dominance of the online travel industry. Like I discussed in a previous post, if you are running a small online travel agency to sell tickets or generate leads for airlines, then you are fighting an unfair battle. As if your fate had not been sealed by the heavy investments by the likes of Expedia and Travelocity, the entry of Google into the market puts a final nail in the coffin of small online travel agencies. The giants like Expedia. Opodo, Priceline etc must wait a few more years to face their Waterloo. Who will be the biggest loser when Google comes to dominate online travel the same way it dominates search? You.


Post Courtesy: Chicago Tribune:

If you haven't Googled a flight itinerary recently, you should try it.

Google's Flight Search, the fledgling search engine that lets you find a ticket and book it directly through an airline, is getting better. Much better.

In recent weeks, the new service has quietly expanded the number of U.S. cities it covers. (It won't say how many destinations are being served, except that the number has doubled.) Google has also integrated flight searches into its authoritative search results, making them easier to find and use.

When I wrote about Flight Search in the fall, it was widely regarded as a work in progress. But that work is progressing at a speedy clip. You might even say that it's flying. "Our goal here is to develop the best possible user experience," says Sean Carlson, a spokesman for Google.

But for whom is the upgraded Flight Search better? For customers like you and me? In the short term, yes. We get to find cheap flights through its slick and blazing-fast search engine, which is powered by recently acquired ITA Software.

For Google? Of course. A more functional site means more bookings, although the company declines to say how many tickets it has sold through this new flights interface.

For the rest of the travel industry, and particularly online travel agencies such as Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity? Maybe not.

Those online agencies want to sell their tickets through Flight Search, and although Google says discussions about including the big three agencies are "ongoing," no agreement has been reached. Google describes these discussions as a good-faith dialogue, but some think that the online agencies aren't a part of Google's business plan and will never be included. Buy a ticket through Flight Search, and you're taken straight to an airline website, although Google says that it's displaying search results from online agencies on a "test" basis under some results.

Think this has no bearing on how you travel? If only.

This little squabble is a sign of a much bigger challenge down the road -- one that led Google's farsighted rivals to fight hard, but unsuccessfully, to block Google's ITA purchase.

The problem isn't the Flight Search of today, an emerging competitor to the big three online agencies. It's what Flight Search could be in a year or two.

Look around at other Google products. If you need to find something online, your first choice is Google's dominant search engine. Often, it's your only choice. If you're looking for a sleek, intuitive e-mail service, it's Gmail. A place for online video? Google's YouTube. For easy online ads? AdSense by Google.

We live in a Google world. Google holds more than a 70 percent market share among online search engines. Gmail is one of the most popular e-mail services and certainly the easiest to use. Sites such as YouTube and AdSense don't have any meaningful competition.

To suggest that Google isn't in travel to do anything less than dominate in the same way would be naive.

So what's the problem? Isn't the current system -- with travel agents facilitating the purchase -- inefficient and in need of a smarter approach? Possibly.

But there may be such a thing as too smart.

It isn't difficult to imagine Google controlling most online travel purchases in the not-too-distant future. And until recently, I didn't have an issue with that; after all, if Google can offer cheaper tickets or better flight options by cutting out the middleman, who cares?

And then, one recent Sunday afternoon, I posted a trailer (http://youtu.be/iejNE9gba6w) for my new book, "Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals" on YouTube. Within a few minutes, the video was deleted -- erroneously tagged as spam by Google. (With a title like "Scammed," that's an easy mistake to make.) But then YouTube pulled my entire channel down without notice. And then my Gmail account went dark. Within a few minutes, my entire digital life had been suspended.

I managed to restore my e-mail account the same day, but my YouTube channel remained offline for three days, even though I made repeated attempts to persuade Google to review the arbitrary takedown. Google eventually restored my account, but only after I contacted it in an official capacity. The company apologized for the deletion but would not offer an explanation for its actions on the record, citing its policy of not discussing individual cases.

Of course, I'm not saying that Google would ever, or could ever, do the same to its travel competitors. In fact, Kayak has said that it's "confident in its ability to compete" with Google Flight Search. But my experience taught me an important lesson about how integral Google is to my everyday life. I can't function without it.

I can't imagine this breathtaking dominance escaping the attention of regulators much longer. But if it does -- if Google takes over travel -- there could be serious and long-lasting consequences that could harm consumers and businesses. Imagine what might happen to an airline or hotel company that disagrees with the way Google prices its products when it holds a commanding market share in travel? It could be cut off from millions of customers with a single keystroke.

What if Google drives one or two online travel agencies, or a company such as Kayak, which searches multiple sites for flights, out of business? Where do we go when our only viable option is Google? What would happen to innovation when one company controls so much?

"Consumers would pay higher prices for airfares and other products and services as a result of Google coming to dominate the online travel market," predicts Ben Hammer, a spokesman for FairSearch, a coalition of travel companies that compete with Google.

Do we really want to live in that world? 


Post Courtesy


Email Us at FlightAfricablog@gmail.com

Google Flight Search Angers Internet Rivals

Google Inc.'s newest push into online travel has begun to roil the industry, the latest example of the company extending its market power into increasingly diverse aspects of economic life.
GOOGAIR_jmp
Competitors say Google is abusing its power in Web search to gain sway over the $110 billion online travel business. 
 
Starting in December, Google began placing its new flight-search service atop general search results so that its own results appear prominently above links to major middlemen such as Expedia Inc., Orbitz Worldwide Inc. and Priceline.com Inc.

Google searches such as "NY to LA" now yield a Google-powered interactive chart of the cheapest airfares between the two cities. Google's flight tool links exclusively to the airlines' websites.

Pushed further down on the screen are links to top travel websites, which rely on Google for 10% to 20% of their traffic, according to web analytics firm Compete Inc.
WSJ's Jack Nicas reports travel search engines are taking issue with Google over the company's placement of travel search results at the top of search pages. 

Just how Google ranks and displays searches has become a key question for modern commerce, where Google stands as a gatekeeper for buying decisions. Once content to simply produce search results, the 13-year-old company is increasingly getting into the guts of these markets, too, offering everything from online music to local coupons to mobile phones.

In many ways, Google is still learning how to balance the conflicting demands of being both search-arbiter and market competitor.

Last year, Google faced antitrust scrutiny from the Justice Department over its plans to acquire ITA Software Inc., the flight-data company that powers Google's new tool and some of its competitors, including Orbitz and Kayak Interactive Corp. Those sites opposed the Google-ITA transaction.

Google eventually made several concessions before the DOJ gave its final OK in April, agreeing to make travel data available to competitors. While Google wasn't required by the DOJ to link directly to the travel sites, it emphasized that it would "build tools that drive more traffic to airline and online travel agency sites."

Competitors say that Google is now violating the spirit of that commitment.

Google acknowledges it has failed to make good on assurances it would link to the travel sites, but the company says it had no choice. "The airlines told us that they would not give us [travel data] if we provided booking links to" online travel agencies, Jeremy Wertheimer, ITA's founder and now a Google vice president, said at an online travel conference last month.

He added that Google still wants to include travel sites, and "we'll keep knocking on that door to see if things change." A Google spokesman declined further comment.

There is no sign consumers are being harmed by Google's new features.
Identical queries on Google and the major travel websites nearly always yield the same lowest fare.

Microsoft's Bing, which has less than a quarter of Google's audience, also places its flight-search tool atop search results.

The Justice Department declined to comment.
Google's flight search is a boon to airlines that have long struggled to draw traffic away from online travel agencies, which charge airlines for bookings. Last year those sites handled $17.5 billion, or nearly a third of the flights booked online, according to travel research firm PhoCusWright.

It costs airlines more than $11 to process a booking made via online travel agencies, compared to less than $1 for one made on their own websites, said Henry Harteveldt, analyst at Atmosphere Research.
Google lists booking links to the airlines as advertisements, but the company declined to comment on how much money it makes from the arrangement.

American Airlines parent AMR Corp. requires other flight search engines that don't sell tickets, such as Kayak, to only include booking links directly to AA.com, cutting out online travel agencies. "We and consumers are both better off if we can lower our costs in order to offer lower fares," an AMR spokesman said.

The world's biggest carriers by traffic, United Continental Holdings Inc. and Delta Air Lines Inc., declined to comment. Airlines for America, the trade organization of U.S. airlines, also declined to comment.

Robert Birge, Kayak's chief marketing officer, said that though Google may not be breaking the law, the company is still breaking its promise to link to travel sites.

"It's concerning that they said that during a government investigation as a core argument and then just sort of ignored it," he said. "It would be nice to have a company that holds itself up as a light of corporate morality to actually stand by what they say."

Earlier this year Google attempted to weed out "low quality" websites from the top of search-results pages. Scores of sites began howling that Google discriminated against them, while others praised Google for improving results.

Google executives have long stated that search engine changes are done for users' benefit, not to punish specific websites. In talks with regulators and lawmakers, Google has often pointed to a federal court ruling in 2003 that stated that Google's search results are "opinions" and are "entitled to full constitutional protection."
Carroll Rheem, research director at PhoCusWright, said travel websites "should be rightfully concerned" by Google's entrance into the market.

She said that online travel agencies are partly protected because hotels produce most of their revenue. Google poses the biggest threat to sites like Kayak that don't sell tickets, Ms. Rheem said.

Kayak filed documents for an initial public offering last year but has yet to sell shares. Industry analysts say that head-to-head competition from Google could scuttle the IPO.

Mr. Birge, of Kayak, said Google has shown it has an "explicit policy to intercept general search queries with their products," and therefore, "their argument that they're not engaging in anticompetitive practices doesn't hold up to basic logic."

The Federal Trade Commission has been investigating Google's practices for the past six months. In mid-December, leaders of the Senate's antitrust subcommittee urged the FTC to investigate further, raising questions whether Google could remain an "unbiased" search engine while owning products such as its flight-search tool, "from which the company derives substantial advertising revenues."

In a written response to the committee last month, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt defended Google products' placement, saying the company's fundamental goal is "to connect users to the information they seek," and thus for many searches, the company aims to provide answers rather than just links.

Google's tool is still imperfect. It only searches domestic flights. Google said it is working to add international ones, and ultimately, it aims to trigger the tool with searches such as "flights to somewhere sunny for under $500 in January."

Article Courtesy WSJ
Email Us at FlightAfricablog@gmail.com